There is no introduction to the colloquially titled I Wonâ€™t be in on Monday. There is no perfunctory schpiel prefacing the performance concerning donors or future shows or money that is needed. That is not to say that these prefaces do not have their place, as calls to endorse the arts and small theatres are absolutely tantamount to the continuation of performances as fine as these. But Anne Stocktonâ€™s dislodging and immersive one woman show needs to be framed in precisely those conditionsâ€”dislodging and immersive. As the audience ambles into the packed theatre, there is a stark solidarity to the stage that, somewhat incongruously, fills the space with its haunting, bareboned quality. The singular chair facing the crowd, austere and perplexing, manages to command more space than the audience can thoroughly reconcile with or acknowledge. To have interrupted the experience of walking into and settling oneself in such an environment would have been a disservice to the show.
And so I Wonâ€™t be inâ€¦ commenced with no interruption nor introduction, simply the playâ€™s writer, sole star, and creative laborer, Anne Stockton, emerging onto the stage with strident force, seating herself in the eerily commanding lone chair on stage. The play, which unfolds as a dialogue that we as the audience are privy to only one side of (Stocktonâ€™s Nikkiâ€™s responses, diatribes, soliloquies and asides), is an interrogation of a vivacious woman in regards to expensive rings that have been stolen from the company with which she is employed. This is perhaps the most rudimentary exposition of the one woman show. What I Wonâ€™t be inâ€¦ is at its most visceral level is an active disassembling of a womanâ€™s tangled, multidimensional psyche as the faÃ§ade she has constructed for herself and others is eroded throughout the playâ€™s unconventional action. As Nikki converses with the unseen police officers, the audience begins to comprehend the meticulously sutured fragments of self that Nikki has very purposefully patched and woven togetherâ€”she is a new employee and in love with her job and her very understanding employer; she met a new, extraordinarily wealthy, spontaneous and passionate man at a casino who she is in love with and has been living with; her life is a little unceremonious but ultimately fulfilling and coherent; she is absolutely befuddled as to how the rings could have been taken and where they could possibly be; etc., etc.
But as Nikkiâ€™s conversation with the detectives progresses, we are exposed to the fractured membranes of her inner selfâ€”she is heavily medicated; her relationship with her new lover (revealed through phone conversations) is crumbling without her even fully recognizing it; she is codependent on her mother; she is apt to switch her affections and her outlandish plan to fly out of the country (her reason, presumably, why she â€œwonâ€™t be in on Mondayâ€) to the detective conducting her interrogation; she perhaps has more involvement with the disappearance of the jewelry than even she allows herself to be aware of. From a script standpoint, the play is nearly flawless, and Stocktonâ€™s progression from a self-possessed yet visibly unbalanced woman is extraordinarily subtle. By the time the playâ€™s somewhat double entendre, titular meaning is actualized, the audience has connected to Nikki in a way that makes the conclusion even more complicatedly heart-wrenching. Stocktonâ€™s performance is resilient and unwavering, even though at times some of the technical aspects break down a bit. What is most transcendent about the show is Stocktonâ€™s ability to radically transform the experience of speaking to an audience into one in which she simply exists as her own microcosm on stage. That is to say, the audience never once feels as though they are an audience during I Wonâ€™t be inâ€¦ Rather, Stockton simultaneously consumes and is completely absorbed into the theatrical space she inhabits, allowing the play to become something not just to be observed, but to be lived.
I Wonâ€™t be inâ€¦ is a fantastic chapter in off the WALLâ€™s stalwart legacy in presenting feminist-minded pieces. While at times the play veers on harmful or ghettoizing tropes for womenâ€”particularly women suffering from particular mental health issuesâ€”the play ultimately portrays a robust, flawed, and complexly damaged woman who is not defined by her gender or her psychosis. Both Stockton and off the WALL challenged the conventions of female representation in the show.
I Won’t be in on MondayÂ has unfortunately closed already but you can follow off the WALL up to New York City in February. More detailsÂ here.Â
Categories: Archived Reviews